main menuhome
forums
Show me new threads!
bookmarks
post article
view blogs
vault you must be level 2 to upload files to your vault
downloads you must be logged to access downloads
Rootkit Collection
|
The Chaz Network Scan Tool : message board
 Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 20 2005, 06:16 (UTC+0)
| |
Stolen ? | Just let us know why your code resembles
the Attack tool kit ? even the plugins are from there.
http://www.computec.ch/projekte/atk/
Lastly just went through your code, it sucks ***
| |
| |
 Posted by neocrackr
(Project Leader) [ip info hidden] - Oct 20 2005, 09:58 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | yes , you can download plugs form this site .
but my Chaz have others tools like MD5 Password cracker.
have fun | |
| |
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 21 2005, 04:49 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | Let me tell you a few things Mr. Neo.
Using VB for password cracking purposes is very lame.it is very slow and btw how is your MD5 cracker better than john or cain, cain has even support for rainbow tables. Secondly your code is very much stolen and broken, seems you have just begun programming in VB. | |
|
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 20 2005, 08:24 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | IT IS VERY MUCH STOLEN
very bad. | |
| |
 Posted by hoglund
(Underboss) [ip info hidden] - Oct 21 2005, 02:41 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | Well, that kinda sucks. Can you post the original source URL?
-G | |
| |
| |
| |
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 21 2005, 15:11 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | What is there ? i could not find anything
and nothing is funny about it. | |
| |
| Posted by neocrackr
(Project Leader) [ip info hidden] - Oct 21 2005, 18:58 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | in end of this text writes
Marc Ruef of Computec Software ( http://www.computec.ch )
Robert M. Hubley of MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and RSA Data Security, Inc
Shane Croft of Crofts Software ( http://www.croftssoftware.com )
and specail specail thanks from Greg.
(c)2005 THE CRACKERS GROUP INC , Nima Bagheri
this is my friends and i gived they's release of sources.
have fun | |
| |
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 22 2005, 05:41 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | So they stole it with you and something tells me you are
a greater liar than i thought. | |
| |
| Posted by neocrackr
(Project Leader) [ip info hidden] - Oct 22 2005, 20:24 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | you're wrong my friend.
but
there is some fiction in your truth,
and some truth in your fiction.
to know the truth, you must risk everything !
have fun
| |
| |
 Posted by phew
(Normal user) [ip info hidden] - Oct 23 2005, 07:17 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | | Nothing but ridiculous | |
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Oct 23 2005, 03:09 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | **YOU SUCK**
THELAMERS_GROUP
| |
| |
 Posted by H3L51nQ
(Untrusted stranger) [ip info hidden] - Nov 02 2005, 18:53 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | Hey warl0ck, I have a chalange 4u. If you know what is wrong with the code RE-RIGHT IT!
I've found that those who can't, complain. witch ru?
And neocrakr, if you did snatch it, bad bad. Write something that you can call your own. (snatch and plant worked in preschool, keep it out of the proforce) | |
| |
| Posted by warl0ck
(Rootkit Contributor) [ip info hidden] - Nov 04 2005, 02:13 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | H3L51nQ i have better things to do than rewriting some
lame vb code. | |
|
 Posted by GoceVida
(Normal user) [ip info hidden] - Oct 27 2005, 20:51 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | | wtf? What an ass. | |
| |
 Posted by simpler
(Normal user) [ip info hidden] - Nov 05 2005, 04:28 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | I know him,
He is hust an Iranian liar. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted by merlvingian
(Project Leader) [ip info hidden] - Oct 21 2005, 03:30 (UTC+0)
| |
Re: Stolen ? | He did in the first post; I gave it a brief look over. At the minimum the plugins dir windiff'd indentical.
Do not have VB installed (wordpad doesnt give me all dem pretty colors) and personally do not have the time to aduit the source, but it did have alot of similarities at a glance. | |
|
|
|
|